© 2024 Connecticut Public

FCC Public Inspection Files:
WEDH · WEDN · WEDW · WEDY · WNPR
WPKT · WRLI-FM · WEDW-FM · Public Files Contact
ATSC 3.0 FAQ
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Before It Releases Subpoena, Hartford Waits to Hear From Feds

Jeff Cohen
/
WNPR

Attorneys for Mayor Pedro Segarra say they are still waiting to hear from federal prosecutors as to whether they can release a federal grand jury subpoena.

On Friday, the city announced it had received a subpoena from the feds. They're apparently looking into the relationship between city Treasurer Adam Cloud and insurance broker Earl O'Garro, who runs Hybrid Insurance Group. It's a story we've covered pretty extensively over the past few weeks. You can learn more about it throughout our website.

We asked the city for the subpoena last week. In response, we got just the cover letter -- proof that the subpoena existed, but not much more. Information as to what the feds are looking for is on an attachment.  But the city said that attachment is exempt from disclosure. It said the federal rules of criminal procedure protect the secrecy of federal grand jury investigations, and, therefore, of the attachment.

Lawyers we spoke to yesterday took issue with that claim. And we did, too. We asked the city to reconsider its position. On Monday, we got another email from Deputy Corporation Counsel L. John Van Norden. In it, he said that the "U.S. Attorney has indicated they view the subpoena itself as subject to grand jury secrecy and as 'sealed.' We have asked for clarification."

Now, the Van Norden said he has given federal prosecutors a deadline of 5 p.m. today.

While our preference is always transparency, the U.S. Attorney’s office on Friday requested we not release the entire subpoena because it would interfere with the on-going investigation by the grand jury. We have requested confirmation from the U.S. Attorney’s office by 5pm today as to whether the subpoena is sealed or not. If the subpoena is not sealed, it will be released in its entirety as we respect and appreciate the public’s significant interest in this matter.

Van Norden has earlier suggested that, if the document is "sealed," that would prevent its release. Which would leave one question: 

If the document is sealed, wouldn't the city have violated that seal last week when it released the cover page of the subpoena?

More to come.

Jeff Cohen started in newspapers in 2001 and joined Connecticut Public in 2010, where he worked as a reporter and fill-in host. In 2017, he was named news director. Then, in 2022, he became a senior enterprise reporter.

Stand up for civility

This news story is funded in large part by Connecticut Public’s Members — listeners, viewers, and readers like you who value fact-based journalism and trustworthy information.

We hope their support inspires you to donate so that we can continue telling stories that inform, educate, and inspire you and your neighbors. As a community-supported public media service, Connecticut Public has relied on donor support for more than 50 years.

Your donation today will allow us to continue this work on your behalf. Give today at any amount and join the 50,000 members who are building a better—and more civil—Connecticut to live, work, and play.

Related Content